Home  |  How It Works  |  Results  |  Reports  |  Latest
๐Ÿง  COMPARE ยท AAPL ยท FTNT

AAPL vs FTNT: AAPL's +1993% Best Signal Compared

How did Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Fortinet (FTNT) fare under JumpstartSignal's 5-stage screening pipeline across our full 2012โ€“2025 walk-forward backtest? We flagged AAPL 8 times (16 signal days, first signal in 2012) and FTNT 4 times (9 signal days, first signal in 2020). Every entry price, return, and SPY comparison below is from the frozen backtest snapshot.

Verdict: Across the 2012โ€“2025 backtest, AAPL led FTNT by +640% average alpha, flagged across 8 clusters vs 4 for FTNT. The strongest AAPL print was +1993% held from Jan 4, 2012. Both sit in Technology. That rules out sector rotation as the explanation; what you're seeing is entry-setup frequency.

Head-to-Head Stats

AAPL ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT Apple Inc. ยท Technology

+1993%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+621%
Win rate100% (8/8)
First flaggedJan 4, 2012
First entry price$12.40
Total signal days16

FTNT ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT Fortinet ยท Technology

+178%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY-19%
Win rate100% (4/4)
First flaggedJul 8, 2020
First entry price$29.27
Total signal days9

Per-Signal Returns

Each bar below shows the best return from one signal cluster, held from the entry date through Feb 1, 2026. The SPY return over the same period is shown alongside each entry, alpha is the gap between the two.

AAPL Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Jan 4, 2012 $12.40 +1993% +588% +1405%
Mar 25, 2014 $17.01 +1426% +350% +1075%
Feb 5, 2015 $26.69 +872% +301% +571%
Apr 28, 2015 $28.63 +806% +291% +516%
May 1, 2017 $33.93 +665% +231% +434%
Nov 1, 2017 $38.94 +566% +203% +363%
May 14, 2018 $44.01 +490% +186% +304%
Jul 24, 2018 $45.09 +476% +174% +302%

FTNT Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Jul 8, 2020 $29.27 +178% +134% +43%
Oct 19, 2021 $66.38 +22% +60% -37%
Dec 17, 2021 $66.77 +22% +58% -36%
Mar 4, 2022 $67.09 +21% +68% -47%

What This Teaches

Which stock a quant system picks more often says more about price-action shape than about the business. AAPL kept printing clean golden-cross + breakout-volume setups (8 distinct clusters over 14 years); FTNT printed them 4ร— in the same window. Same universe, same rules, different output, and that is exactly what a rules-based pipeline is supposed to produce.

Compare More

Free, Always

Get signals like these delivered daily

Free daily signals from the same 5-stage pipeline that flagged these entries.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

FAQ

Is AAPL or FTNT a better momentum stock?

In our 14-year backtest, AAPL had an average alpha of +621% per signal versus -19% for FTNT. AAPL produced 8 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters vs 4 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters for FTNT.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag AAPL?

Jan 4, 2012 at an entry price of $12.40 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +1993% held to the snapshot date, versus +588% for SPY over the same period.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag FTNT?

Jul 8, 2020 at an entry price of $29.27 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +178% held to the snapshot date, versus +134% for SPY.

Does this mean one stock is a buy and the other isn't?

No. Historical signal frequency and past returns are not buy recommendations. Our pipeline identifies entries that would have matched the template historically. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Use these pages as methodology research, not investment advice.

Where does the underlying data come from?

All entries on this page come from the R27 walk-forward validated backtest covering 2012โ€“2025 (the 'seo_active' snapshot in our golden archive). Entry prices, returns, and SPY comparisons are computed from Stooq end-of-day OHLCV and frozen at snapshot time. See our methodology for details.