Home  |  How It Works  |  Results  |  Reports  |  Latest
๐Ÿ‘€ COMPARE ยท ANET ยท RMBS

ANET vs RMBS: 15 Buy Signals vs 2 (2012โ€“2025)

How did Arista Networks (ANET) and Rambus (RMBS) fare under JumpstartSignal's 5-stage screening pipeline across our full 2012โ€“2025 walk-forward backtest? We flagged ANET 15 times (33 signal days, first signal in 2016) and RMBS 2 times (3 signal days, first signal in 2014). Every entry price, return, and SPY comparison below is from the frozen backtest snapshot.

Verdict: Head-to-head, RMBS beat ANET by 144 percentage points of alpha per signal on average, flagged across 2 clusters vs 15 for ANET. RMBS's best cluster so far: +1078% measured from Mar 7, 2014 to the snapshot date. Same sector (Technology), different trajectories, our pipeline isolates the one whose weekly closes kept forming the confluence we score for.

Head-to-Head Stats

ANET ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT Arista Networks ยท Technology

+2540%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+481%
Win rate100% (15/15)
First flaggedNov 10, 2016
First entry price$5.37
Total signal days33

RMBS โœ… OPPORTUNITY Rambus ยท Technology

+1078%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+625%
Win rate100% (2/2)
First flaggedMar 7, 2014
First entry price$9.66
Total signal days3

Per-Signal Returns

Each bar below shows the best return from one signal cluster, held from the entry date through Feb 1, 2026. The SPY return over the same period is shown alongside each entry, alpha is the gap between the two.

ANET Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Nov 10, 2016 $5.37 +2540% +267% +2272%
Aug 4, 2017 $10.75 +1218% +217% +1001%
Oct 31, 2017 $12.49 +1035% +204% +831%
Jan 8, 2018 $15.69 +803% +184% +620%
Feb 14, 2018 $18.88 +651% +188% +462%
May 11, 2021 $20.42 +594% +77% +517%
Oct 19, 2021 $24.13 +487% +60% +428%
Dec 17, 2021 $33.76 +320% +58% +262%
Mar 25, 2022 $34.55 +310% +58% +253%
Jun 13, 2023 $40.87 +247% +61% +186%
Aug 31, 2023 $48.81 +190% +57% +133%
Nov 1, 2023 $52.71 +169% +67% +102%
Feb 9, 2024 $70.61 +101% +40% +60%
May 20, 2024 $75.36 +88% +33% +55%
Aug 30, 2024 $88.34 +60% +24% +36%

RMBS Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Mar 7, 2014 $9.66 +1078% +347% +731%
Apr 11, 2014 $11.60 +881% +362% +519%

What This Teaches

Which stock a quant system picks more often says more about price-action shape than about the business. ANET kept printing clean golden-cross + breakout-volume setups (15 distinct clusters over 14 years); RMBS printed them 2ร— in the same window. Same universe, same rules, different output, and that is exactly what a rules-based pipeline is supposed to produce.

Compare More

Free, Always

Get signals like these delivered daily

Free daily signals from the same 5-stage pipeline that flagged these entries.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

FAQ

Is ANET or RMBS a better momentum stock?

In our 14-year backtest, ANET had an average alpha of +481% per signal versus +625% for RMBS. ANET produced 15 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters vs 2 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters for RMBS.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag ANET?

Nov 10, 2016 at an entry price of $5.37 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +2540% held to the snapshot date, versus +267% for SPY over the same period.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag RMBS?

Mar 7, 2014 at an entry price of $9.66 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +1078% held to the snapshot date, versus +347% for SPY.

Does this mean one stock is a buy and the other isn't?

No. Historical signal frequency and past returns are not buy recommendations. Our pipeline identifies entries that would have matched the template historically. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Use these pages as methodology research, not investment advice.

Where does the underlying data come from?

All entries on this page come from the R27 walk-forward validated backtest covering 2012โ€“2025 (the 'seo_active' snapshot in our golden archive). Entry prices, returns, and SPY comparisons are computed from Stooq end-of-day OHLCV and frozen at snapshot time. See our methodology for details.