Home  |  How It Works  |  Results  |  Reports  |  Latest
๐Ÿง  COMPARE ยท CSCO ยท NVDA

NVDA Beat CSCO by +1207% Average Alpha in Our 14-Year Backtest

How did Cisco Systems (CSCO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) fare under JumpstartSignal's 5-stage screening pipeline across our full 2012โ€“2025 walk-forward backtest? We flagged CSCO 1 time (5 signal days, first signal in 2025) and NVDA 11 times (32 signal days, first signal in 2018). Every entry price, return, and SPY comparison below is from the frozen backtest snapshot.

Verdict: NVDA wins this pair on both alpha and frequency, flagged across 11 clusters vs 1 for CSCO, average alpha gap of +1207% per signal, with the standout cluster (+3413% from Jan 16, 2018) still held to the exit. Both sit in Technology. That rules out sector rotation as the explanation; what you're seeing is entry-setup frequency.

Head-to-Head Stats

CSCO ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT Cisco Systems ยท Technology

+14%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+10%
Win rate100% (1/1)
First flaggedOct 14, 2025
First entry price$68.66
Total signal days5

NVDA ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT NVIDIA Corporation ยท Technology

+3413%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+1217%
Win rate100% (11/11)
First flaggedJan 16, 2018
First entry price$5.44
Total signal days32

Per-Signal Returns

Each bar below shows the best return from one signal cluster, held from the entry date through Feb 1, 2026. The SPY return over the same period is shown alongside each entry, alpha is the gap between the two.

CSCO Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Oct 14, 2025 $68.66 +14% +4% +10%

NVDA Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Jan 16, 2018 $5.44 +3413% +181% +3233%
May 14, 2018 $6.08 +3044% +186% +2858%
Oct 1, 2018 $7.17 +2566% +163% +2403%
Nov 30, 2020 $13.35 +1332% +102% +1230%
Apr 16, 2021 $15.14 +1162% +78% +1085%
May 21, 2021 $14.96 +1178% +76% +1101%
Aug 23, 2021 $21.91 +772% +63% +709%
Aug 23, 2023 $47.09 +306% +60% +246%
Nov 15, 2023 $48.87 +291% +57% +234%
Jan 8, 2024 $52.24 +266% +48% +218%
May 20, 2024 $94.76 +102% +32% +70%

What This Teaches

Which stock a quant system picks more often says more about price-action shape than about the business. NVDA kept printing clean golden-cross + breakout-volume setups (11 distinct clusters over 14 years); CSCO printed them 1ร— in the same window. Same universe, same rules, different output, and that is exactly what a rules-based pipeline is supposed to produce.

Compare More

Free, Always

Get signals like these delivered daily

Free daily signals from the same 5-stage pipeline that flagged these entries.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

FAQ

Is CSCO or NVDA a better momentum stock?

In our 14-year backtest, CSCO had an average alpha of +10% per signal versus +1217% for NVDA. CSCO produced 1 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal cluster vs 11 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters for NVDA.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag CSCO?

Oct 14, 2025 at an entry price of $68.66 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +14% held to the snapshot date, versus +4% for SPY over the same period.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag NVDA?

Jan 16, 2018 at an entry price of $5.44 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +3413% held to the snapshot date, versus +181% for SPY.

Does this mean one stock is a buy and the other isn't?

No. Historical signal frequency and past returns are not buy recommendations. Our pipeline identifies entries that would have matched the template historically. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Use these pages as methodology research, not investment advice.

Where does the underlying data come from?

All entries on this page come from the R27 walk-forward validated backtest covering 2012โ€“2025 (the 'seo_active' snapshot in our golden archive). Entry prices, returns, and SPY comparisons are computed from Stooq end-of-day OHLCV and frozen at snapshot time. See our methodology for details.