Home  |  How It Works  |  Results  |  Reports  |  Latest
๐Ÿค” COMPARE ยท INTC ยท TYL

INTC vs TYL: Head-to-Head Signal Returns (2012โ€“2025)

How did INTC (INTC) and Tyler Technologies (TYL) fare under JumpstartSignal's 5-stage screening pipeline across our full 2012โ€“2025 walk-forward backtest? We flagged INTC 5 times (8 signal days, first signal in 2014) and TYL 8 times (11 signal days, first signal in 2012). Every entry price, return, and SPY comparison below is from the frozen backtest snapshot.

Verdict: TYL outperformed on our pipeline by an average alpha of +383% per signal, flagged across 8 clusters vs 5 for INTC. Best TYL entry: +974% from Jan 23, 2012. These are in Unknown and Technology respectively, our screener doesn't favour either, so the asymmetry is all price-action signal quality.

Head-to-Head Stats

INTC โœ… OPPORTUNITY INTC ยท

+145%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY-181%
Win rate100% (5/5)
First flaggedMar 25, 2014
First entry price$19.00
Total signal days8

TYL ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT Tyler Technologies ยท Technology

+974%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+202%
Win rate100% (8/8)
First flaggedJan 23, 2012
First entry price$34.38
Total signal days11

Per-Signal Returns

Each bar below shows the best return from one signal cluster, held from the entry date through Feb 1, 2026. The SPY return over the same period is shown alongside each entry, alpha is the gap between the two.

INTC Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Mar 25, 2014 $19.00 +145% +350% -206%
Jan 24, 2017 $30.52 +52% +248% -196%
Apr 26, 2017 $30.18 +54% +231% -177%
Dec 18, 2017 $38.59 +20% +190% -170%
Jan 30, 2018 $39.75 +17% +176% -159%

TYL Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Jan 23, 2012 $34.38 +974% +567% +407%
Apr 20, 2012 $40.26 +818% +534% +283%
Jun 22, 2012 $39.95 +825% +552% +273%
Aug 16, 2012 $40.11 +821% +513% +308%
Sep 4, 2012 $40.73 +807% +518% +289%
Apr 25, 2013 $62.63 +490% +440% +50%
Jun 3, 2013 $69.62 +431% +421% +10%
Jul 8, 2013 $72.02 +413% +419% -6%

What This Teaches

Signal frequency is not opinion; it's the pipeline firing or not firing against the same rules. Over the 2012โ€“2025 window, TYL triggered entries 8ร— versus 5ร— for INTC. The lesson here isn't that one company is better than the other; it's that the template is tuned for a specific kind of setup and this pair shows which stock's price behaviour kept offering that setup.

Compare More

Free, Always

Get signals like these delivered daily

Free daily signals from the same 5-stage pipeline that flagged these entries.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

FAQ

Is INTC or TYL a better momentum stock?

In our 14-year backtest, INTC had an average alpha of -181% per signal versus +202% for TYL. INTC produced 5 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters vs 8 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters for TYL.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag INTC?

Mar 25, 2014 at an entry price of $19.00 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +145% held to the snapshot date, versus +350% for SPY over the same period.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag TYL?

Jan 23, 2012 at an entry price of $34.38 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +974% held to the snapshot date, versus +567% for SPY.

Does this mean one stock is a buy and the other isn't?

No. Historical signal frequency and past returns are not buy recommendations. Our pipeline identifies entries that would have matched the template historically. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Use these pages as methodology research, not investment advice.

Where does the underlying data come from?

All entries on this page come from the R27 walk-forward validated backtest covering 2012โ€“2025 (the 'seo_active' snapshot in our golden archive). Entry prices, returns, and SPY comparisons are computed from Stooq end-of-day OHLCV and frozen at snapshot time. See our methodology for details.