Home  |  How It Works  |  Results  |  Reports  |  Latest
๐Ÿค” COMPARE ยท NVDA ยท ORLY

NVDA Beat ORLY by +1052% Average Alpha in Our 14-Year Backtest

How did NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and O'Reilly Automotive (ORLY) fare under JumpstartSignal's 5-stage screening pipeline across our full 2012โ€“2025 walk-forward backtest? We flagged NVDA 11 times (32 signal days, first signal in 2018) and ORLY 1 time (3 signal days, first signal in 2015). Every entry price, return, and SPY comparison below is from the frozen backtest snapshot.

Verdict: Head-to-head, NVDA beat ORLY by 1052 percentage points of alpha per signal on average, flagged across 11 clusters vs 1 for ORLY. NVDA's best cluster so far: +3413% measured from Jan 16, 2018 to the snapshot date. Cross-sector pair (Technology vs Consumer). Our template is sector-agnostic; whichever side posted more clean entries wins on frequency alone.

Head-to-Head Stats

NVDA ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT NVIDIA Corporation ยท Technology

+3413%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+1217%
Win rate100% (11/11)
First flaggedJan 16, 2018
First entry price$5.44
Total signal days32

ORLY โœ… OPPORTUNITY O'Reilly Automotive ยท Consumer

+490%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+165%
Win rate100% (1/1)
First flaggedSep 30, 2015
First entry price$16.67
Total signal days3

Per-Signal Returns

Each bar below shows the best return from one signal cluster, held from the entry date through Feb 1, 2026. The SPY return over the same period is shown alongside each entry, alpha is the gap between the two.

NVDA Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Jan 16, 2018 $5.44 +3413% +181% +3233%
May 14, 2018 $6.08 +3044% +186% +2858%
Oct 1, 2018 $7.17 +2566% +163% +2403%
Nov 30, 2020 $13.35 +1332% +102% +1230%
Apr 16, 2021 $15.14 +1162% +78% +1085%
May 21, 2021 $14.96 +1178% +76% +1101%
Aug 23, 2021 $21.91 +772% +63% +709%
Aug 23, 2023 $47.09 +306% +60% +246%
Nov 15, 2023 $48.87 +291% +57% +234%
Jan 8, 2024 $52.24 +266% +48% +218%
May 20, 2024 $94.76 +102% +32% +70%

ORLY Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Sep 30, 2015 $16.67 +490% +325% +165%

What This Teaches

Stock screening is about frequency, not preference. NVDA was flagged 11ร— and ORLY was flagged 1ร— because NVDA's weekly closes repeatedly matched the confluence we score for. That's why we publish the full record: the absence of a signal on a great company is as instructive as a signal on a mediocre one.

Compare More

Free, Always

Get signals like these delivered daily

Free daily signals from the same 5-stage pipeline that flagged these entries.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

FAQ

Is NVDA or ORLY a better momentum stock?

In our 14-year backtest, NVDA had an average alpha of +1217% per signal versus +165% for ORLY. NVDA produced 11 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters vs 1 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal cluster for ORLY.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag NVDA?

Jan 16, 2018 at an entry price of $5.44 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +3413% held to the snapshot date, versus +181% for SPY over the same period.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag ORLY?

Sep 30, 2015 at an entry price of $16.67 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +490% held to the snapshot date, versus +325% for SPY.

Does this mean one stock is a buy and the other isn't?

No. Historical signal frequency and past returns are not buy recommendations. Our pipeline identifies entries that would have matched the template historically. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Use these pages as methodology research, not investment advice.

Where does the underlying data come from?

All entries on this page come from the R27 walk-forward validated backtest covering 2012โ€“2025 (the 'seo_active' snapshot in our golden archive). Entry prices, returns, and SPY comparisons are computed from Stooq end-of-day OHLCV and frozen at snapshot time. See our methodology for details.