Home  |  How It Works  |  Results  |  Reports  |  Latest
๐Ÿค” COMPARE ยท NVDA ยท TTWO

How NVDA Outperformed TTWO in Our Backtest (2014โ€“2025)

How did NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) fare under JumpstartSignal's 5-stage screening pipeline across our full 2012โ€“2025 walk-forward backtest? We flagged NVDA 11 times (32 signal days, first signal in 2018) and TTWO 1 time (4 signal days, first signal in 2014). Every entry price, return, and SPY comparison below is from the frozen backtest snapshot.

Verdict: Across the 2012โ€“2025 backtest, NVDA led TTWO by +768% average alpha, flagged across 11 clusters vs 1 for TTWO. The strongest NVDA print was +3413% held from Jan 16, 2018. Both sit in Technology. That rules out sector rotation as the explanation; what you're seeing is entry-setup frequency.

Head-to-Head Stats

NVDA ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT NVIDIA Corporation ยท Technology

+3413%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+1217%
Win rate100% (11/11)
First flaggedJan 16, 2018
First entry price$5.44
Total signal days32

TTWO ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT Take-Two Interactive ยท Technology

+756%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+449%
Win rate100% (1/1)
First flaggedNov 7, 2014
First entry price$25.75
Total signal days4

Per-Signal Returns

Each bar below shows the best return from one signal cluster, held from the entry date through Feb 1, 2026. The SPY return over the same period is shown alongside each entry, alpha is the gap between the two.

NVDA Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Jan 16, 2018 $5.44 +3413% +181% +3233%
May 14, 2018 $6.08 +3044% +186% +2858%
Oct 1, 2018 $7.17 +2566% +163% +2403%
Nov 30, 2020 $13.35 +1332% +102% +1230%
Apr 16, 2021 $15.14 +1162% +78% +1085%
May 21, 2021 $14.96 +1178% +76% +1101%
Aug 23, 2021 $21.91 +772% +63% +709%
Aug 23, 2023 $47.09 +306% +60% +246%
Nov 15, 2023 $48.87 +291% +57% +234%
Jan 8, 2024 $52.24 +266% +48% +218%
May 20, 2024 $94.76 +102% +32% +70%

TTWO Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Nov 7, 2014 $25.75 +756% +307% +449%

What This Teaches

You can admire a stock and still never get a trade on it. NVDA: 11 signal clusters across our backtest. TTWO: 1. The screener doesn't know which is the 'better' company; it just rewards whichever chart keeps producing the entries our weights favour. Publishing both the hits and the misses is how we keep the methodology honest.

Compare More

Free, Always

Get signals like these delivered daily

Free daily signals from the same 5-stage pipeline that flagged these entries.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

FAQ

Is NVDA or TTWO a better momentum stock?

In our 14-year backtest, NVDA had an average alpha of +1217% per signal versus +449% for TTWO. NVDA produced 11 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters vs 1 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal cluster for TTWO.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag NVDA?

Jan 16, 2018 at an entry price of $5.44 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +3413% held to the snapshot date, versus +181% for SPY over the same period.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag TTWO?

Nov 7, 2014 at an entry price of $25.75 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +756% held to the snapshot date, versus +307% for SPY.

Does this mean one stock is a buy and the other isn't?

No. Historical signal frequency and past returns are not buy recommendations. Our pipeline identifies entries that would have matched the template historically. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Use these pages as methodology research, not investment advice.

Where does the underlying data come from?

All entries on this page come from the R27 walk-forward validated backtest covering 2012โ€“2025 (the 'seo_active' snapshot in our golden archive). Entry prices, returns, and SPY comparisons are computed from Stooq end-of-day OHLCV and frozen at snapshot time. See our methodology for details.