Home  |  How It Works  |  Results  |  Reports  |  Latest
๐Ÿ‘€ COMPARE ยท AAPL ยท SMCI

AAPL vs SMCI: AAPL's +1993% Best Signal Compared

How did Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Super Micro Computer (SMCI) fare under JumpstartSignal's 5-stage screening pipeline across our full 2012โ€“2025 walk-forward backtest? We flagged AAPL 8 times (16 signal days, first signal in 2012) and SMCI 3 times (9 signal days, first signal in 2022). Every entry price, return, and SPY comparison below is from the frozen backtest snapshot.

Verdict: Head-to-head, AAPL beat SMCI by 480 percentage points of alpha per signal on average, flagged across 8 clusters vs 3 for SMCI. AAPL's best cluster so far: +1993% measured from Jan 4, 2012 to the snapshot date. Same sector (Technology), different trajectories, our pipeline isolates the one whose weekly closes kept forming the confluence we score for.

Head-to-Head Stats

AAPL ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT Apple Inc. ยท Technology

+1993%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+621%
Win rate100% (8/8)
First flaggedJan 4, 2012
First entry price$12.40
Total signal days16

SMCI ๐Ÿ† SPOTLIGHT Super Micro Computer ยท Technology

+280%
Best signal return (held to Feb 1, 2026)
Avg alpha vs SPY+141%
Win rate100% (3/3)
First flaggedNov 4, 2022
First entry price$7.66
Total signal days9

Per-Signal Returns

Each bar below shows the best return from one signal cluster, held from the entry date through Feb 1, 2026. The SPY return over the same period is shown alongside each entry, alpha is the gap between the two.

AAPL Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Jan 4, 2012 $12.40 +1993% +588% +1405%
Mar 25, 2014 $17.01 +1426% +350% +1075%
Feb 5, 2015 $26.69 +872% +301% +571%
Apr 28, 2015 $28.63 +806% +291% +516%
May 1, 2017 $33.93 +665% +231% +434%
Nov 1, 2017 $38.94 +566% +203% +363%
May 14, 2018 $44.01 +490% +186% +304%
Jul 24, 2018 $45.09 +476% +174% +302%

SMCI Signal Clusters

Entry DateEntry PriceReturnSPY ReturnAlpha vs SPY
Nov 4, 2022 $7.66 +280% +90% +190%
Feb 17, 2023 $8.67 +236% +79% +157%
Mar 22, 2023 $11.25 +159% +81% +78%

What This Teaches

Signal frequency is not opinion; it's the pipeline firing or not firing against the same rules. Over the 2012โ€“2025 window, AAPL triggered entries 8ร— versus 3ร— for SMCI. The lesson here isn't that one company is better than the other; it's that the template is tuned for a specific kind of setup and this pair shows which stock's price behaviour kept offering that setup.

Compare More

Free, Always

Get signals like these delivered daily

Free daily signals from the same 5-stage pipeline that flagged these entries.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

FAQ

Is AAPL or SMCI a better momentum stock?

In our 14-year backtest, AAPL had an average alpha of +621% per signal versus +141% for SMCI. AAPL produced 8 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters vs 3 SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy-signal clusters for SMCI.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag AAPL?

Jan 4, 2012 at an entry price of $12.40 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +1993% held to the snapshot date, versus +588% for SPY over the same period.

When did JumpstartSignal first flag SMCI?

Nov 4, 2022 at an entry price of $7.66 (SPOTLIGHT or OPPORTUNITY buy signal). That signal has returned +280% held to the snapshot date, versus +90% for SPY.

Does this mean one stock is a buy and the other isn't?

No. Historical signal frequency and past returns are not buy recommendations. Our pipeline identifies entries that would have matched the template historically. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Use these pages as methodology research, not investment advice.

Where does the underlying data come from?

All entries on this page come from the R27 walk-forward validated backtest covering 2012โ€“2025 (the 'seo_active' snapshot in our golden archive). Entry prices, returns, and SPY comparisons are computed from Stooq end-of-day OHLCV and frozen at snapshot time. See our methodology for details.